Film History: War in Film

A modern commentary on cinema’s status on the war genre.

From science fiction, character, true story, the war genre has seen it all and lets explore how it has been represented in the history of cinema.

The war genre has been around as way back as the world wars begun, we have seen the high’s and lows of the genre, with Michael Bay, Spielberg, Mel Gibson, Oliver Stone, Sam Mends and now Christopher Nolan whose film, Dunkirk, is as fresh as bag of ice cube lettuce, lets discuss.

Orchestra and theatrical performance in war, the director allows actors screen time to develop their emotion on screen, with some of the best and well-known examples being Apocalypse Now with Martin Sheen and Marlon Brando. However, the genre has depth and range, providing directors the opportunity to execute the genre differently, either through extreme violence, an original narrative or in our case study, the sublime editing of Dunkirk.

Another example could be Jarhead. Jarhead doesn’t particularly have a story but it has character, even when these characters are’nt fully developed, their screen time and presences allow us to learn a lot about them and who they are. In that case, the war element feels close to home, very relatable about a film that gets the most out of the characters before war even starts.

Platoon, on the other hand, blends both character and war together, we get the violence which is used in conjunction with character development. jarhead just does;not have the focus on the war effort, in fact, it purposely avoids it for thematic effect.

It’s one of the best subtle anti-war films ever made, a film that celebrates characters who are obviously opposed to the fighting war effort, but don’t actively say it or express it, they keep this frustration to themselves for it to only come out in outbursts and conflict between their crew.

A modern contrasting example is Dunkirk featuring less emphasis on character, which I believe could be “this decade’s quintessential war film”. Every decade has been met with an outstanding war film, yes we have experienced several low-budget war films that have stood on their own including Kajaki. Every decade has had their Saving Private Ryan.

Saving Private Ryan is more narrative driven, it has supposedly an original narrative that takes the viewer on an emotional long journey following the rescue of a brother who lost his family in combat. The film feels like its own theatrical picture rather than a piece that is made to just represent war alone, Saving Private Ryan takes it up a notch with character and story.

Dunkirk will be the war film of the late 2000s, more specifically the WW2 film that dominated the 2010’s, with its close competitor being Hacksaw Ridge, which was more story and character driven but perhaps Dunkirk’s technical charm, universal appeal with Nolan’s experienced yet down to earth wizardly approach outruns the heavy and dramatic Hacksaw Ridge, told by the knight Mel Gibson.

Another film that follows Dunkirk in its tradition is Black Hawk Down, a war film that is so situated in realism, that the approach allows for tight editing and sound effects. The crew are concerned with making sure the situation hits, which means that the film is light on character, however, its action scenes really make the characters stand out as heroes.

In terms of Dunkirk’s lack of grotesque imagery, this is a contradiction to Saving Private Ryan, as that film didn’t hold back on its violence. However, Dunkirk’s 12a/PG-13 rating is really important in drawing in a much larger audience, a film that could be seen for the whole family, Saving Private Ryan and Hacksaw Ridge are both brutal at times, urging younger viewers to perhaps take a backseat.

Dunkirk has established WW2 as a cinematic language and art form in the hands of Nolan and his editing team who have tightly knitted a tense situation from beginning to end. Although the cast is talented, the film pays homage to the battle and soldiers of Dunkirk more than anything else. This approach is incredibly contained and focused, leaving little filler and crust for anything else.

Dunkirk’s execution was a sight to not forget, but its story is remarkable and inspiring. Unlike Saving Private Ryan, where its narrative is more controlled, the story of Dunkirk actually happened, which really turns up the authenticity. Its inspiring, remarkable, and a testament to the thousands who risked everything.

Its visuals are a testament of how wonderful war cinema can get, its images belong in the same iconography as some of the images in Apocalypse Now I believe, take a peak. Its worth pointing out that Dunkirk excels in the plane action scenes, there are unlike any other war film.

Cast your mind back to Saving Private Ryan, another film with a great cast, but you forget about the celebrity status aspect as soon as that first bullet flies past the soldiers. As classic Spielberg tradition, he transports you’re attention into the scene and situation. 

Dunkirk is strictly depicting an event that took place during WW2, its execution is simple and solid. It wastes no time with character development and its story is situated in plot context. The film has restablished war on the big screen, not many WW2 films in recent years have achieved a similar acclaim, Dunkirk may be the main WW2 film that younger viewers grew up with and connect with. Its story is fantastic and heroic, but its not too gruesome and the film never gets too dark.

Its thematic conclusion is uplifting when you consider what the soldiers had been through and the cinematography is a vast improvement from war films in the past, to not put any of those films down today but the technology that film crew have now means that the film will always look better than amazing at home on blu ray or 4K, Dunkirk is a must own in that regard and older war films just can’t compare in the same visual quality.

When Saving Private Ryan broke out in the late 90’s, it re-established war violence in a way that cinema had’nt seen before. In that regard, it was ambitious and took a lot of risks. When you go for hyper realistic violence, there is always a risk that the audience gets turned off because its just too much. Just like Spielberg fashion, the director likes to takes risks and sticks with his decisions. Nolan’s interesting cast is a hybrid of celebrity and newcomers, with the likes of Tom Hardy, Harry Styles, Cillian Murphy and the magnificent Kenneth Branagh, whose performance is one of my favorites from him.

Nolan on the other hand, has a more delicate brush to the war genre, utilizing the audience as a spectator in an exhibition, taking us along the way of the events of Dunkirk. Dunkirk is more of a museum, whereas Saving Private Ryan is a rollercoaster. I believe that Dunkirk will be the quintessential WW2 film for young audiences for the next couple of decades, but we will see. Considering the depth of its story, its perhaps the genre’s most down to earth representation.

Although, its spectacle is truly impressive, it never seems to take away from the core essence of Nolan’s themes. We have seen plenty of war films loose the plot with its action, which causes irregular pacing, editing and tone. Dunkirk is as fresh as a perfectly sliced tomato, yes the tomato may not be as exciting as passionfruit, but it’s well preserved, finely cut and ready to order…Dunkirk ladies and gentlemen.

Even though Dunkirk is our main case study, After looking at these war films, we have 4 dimensions of the genre on display here. These include, character in Jarhead, Performance in Apocalypse Now, story in Saving Private Ryan and plot in Dunkirk. These are 4 lovely combinations of the genre, just like a perfect chicken sub sandwich. For those that want the character and the action, Platoon is right up that angle.

As a standalone film, Dunkirk is an absorbing ride, however, I invite you to watch a number of the war films discussed before seeing Dunkirk, as it may just blow you away that little bit more, once you know how unique its approach is, lets find out.

As Dunkirk was our case study, you can pick the film up on blu ray here.

However, what is your favorite out of the bunch?

Author Bio

Sam is a content writer. He loves all elements connected with film and writes with passion, always. You can find him on Linkedin, where you will be able to read more articles. When he is not writing, you can find him practicing football.

The Top Five best Action Scenes from The Expendables

In Preparation for The Expendables 4 , a film with the series’s highest budget, lets go over the series top five best action scenes.

It would be 2010 that would be the start of 3-part trilogy. Whilst some have disliked the idea and execution right from the get go, others have been able to get on board with the concept and embrace its utter ridiculousness.

Whether what side you are on, this franchise has boasted some remarkable moments from most of the cast members, to the point where you just can’t believe how any them survived, but remember, The Expendables bridge that fine gap between ordinary and superhero.

If you are considering checking this franchise out then perhaps these 5 moments may convince you or give you a better idea of what to expect. It’s true these films have never been rewarded for character development and writing, but the iconography alone is still entertaining enough.

Most importantly, the action set pieces have been well put together in each film, with director Simon West (Con Air, Tomb Raider, The Mechanic) and Patrick Hughes (The Hitman’s Bodyguard) both having their say on how the film should look and feel, but it was the experienced Stallone that set the standard for the series with the first film, offering more of a dramatic and realistic take on the action. To be fair, the series has maintained this tone in its sequels.

However, to this day, I still don’t know whether some of the kills are supposed to have a sense of self-aware humor to them or if they are meant to be just plain violent. 

Here we go!

Starting off with number 5.

5. The Expendables: Ride and Die. Catching a flight!

This scene is pulled straight out of the first film. This had all the makings to be an interesting action scene on paper. It’s a scene where it develops the chemistry between Statham and Stallone even further as the two have to work together in a pretty extraordinary situation.

Stallone and his crew definitely thought of several ways of how they can destroy enemies on a large scale, this method seems to be very effective. For any die-hard fans of planes out there, the plane they use is a Grumman HU-16A Albatross.

This scene will be especially problematic to execute in real life, but Statham and Stallone pull it off. They would later use it in the sequel, but it was at its most fun in the first film. A unique action scene, one which we had’nt seen before in the modern action genre category of films in the 2010’s and maybe even prior. Its retro old school action that for me worked a charm and a blast.

4. The Expendables 2: The Airport Scene

The sequel grossed more than its original and its for good reasons.

This scene comes from the second film, where newcomers Chuck Norris and Van Damme were added.What a way to conclude the sequel, featuring more stars and this time the tone is comedic but just as violent.

However, we see Bruce Willis make a comeback as well as more screen time with Arnie. It’s corny in places but it has the visual literacy of action icons at its peak. We get to hear several dialogue exchanges from their previous work. Some of the lines work and some don’t. The highlight is Bruce Willis driving a small car with Arnie as the passenger.

3. The Expendables 3 final act/Mel Vs Stallone

Its Mad Max vs Rambo and these two don’t like each other, if only they could work together they could dominate the world.

The Expendables 3 is probably the least violent in the series but the Stallone and Gibson rivalry is what keeps the film working and helps you to take the film seriously when the bloodless action occurs to fulfill its PG-13 rating. Given the critical and financial reception of this film, some would be surprised it’s this high on the list, but this fight is pretty cool.

They both had stunt doubles for some of this sequence, but a lot of it looks real for the most part. These are two actors who are in their sixties and are still giving convincing action. Harrison Ford will also get some screen time in the final act. Hovering above in a helicopter but not the Millenium Falcon.

In this last scene, we get some good action scenes from some of the younger cast crew who are all very tough, Arnold can be seen using his AA-12. This finale is good because it is’nt full of constant one liners unlike the finale of the second film. Its quick and snappy.

2. Stallone Vs Van Damme 

In terms of sheer brutality, this scene packs it.

The physical nature of this fight scene is on par with some of the fight scenes from The Raid (2011). You can feel every crunch and punch. Both of these actors have very different physical attributes which make this scene worth watching.

It’s two styles clashing together, the outcome is intense. Both clearly know how to prepare physically, making the scene just that more realistic. In contrast to the Gibson vs Stallone fight, this installment was given a hard R rating, whereas the third was PG-13.

1. The Final Act

For my number one spot, I wanted to put emphasis on the first film as it is still the best in the series. The final action scene is fantastic because it takes itself seriously, you feel the stakes and the threat.

Given it’s been a little over 10 years since its release. the final act of the first film is everything you want from this type of genre. You see explosions, knives, bombs and more use of the AA12. To me, the tone of this final act feels the most realistic compared to the sequels, which sounds a bit ridiculous but It has a sense of grit.

The whole sequence is around 25-30 mins long and it never felt too long or too short.It’s a group of around 6 men taking on a whole army. The camera work and stunt work are all top notch and there is great use of physical combat. In particular, look out for Jason Statham and Jet Li’s characters as both have their moments of fine armory.

Overall

Action Scenes From The Expendables

These films work as an expression of mindless entertainment. The casting is different for each film, which gives the viewer a deeper incentive to be interested. I think they are good for Friday and Saturday night watches.

If you are looking for films that pull the heart strings, I would recommend steering away from this franchise, although lookout for the scenes with Mickey Rourke in The Expendables. One aspect I would like to point out is the soundtrack by Brian Tyler. Each of these scenes would not have been as effective without his soundtrack and input.

Brian Tyler would later compose the music for the Fast and Furious films and Iron Man 3. I recommend checking out his work, he’s very talented. Out of the three, the second one was the most financially successful, achieving a worldwide figure of $311 million. This film is also the only fresh entry on rotten tomatoes with a 67% rating.

Most importantly, check out the films for yourself, all three films are available on Amazon Prime. and you can buy the three film collection here.

Do you agree with the list?

What are your favorite action scenes from The Expendables?

Article by Samuel Edwards

Author Bio

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is p7160341.jpg

Sam is a content writer. He loves all elements connected with film and writes with passion, always. You can find him on Linkedin, where you will be able to read more articles. When he is not writing, you can find him practicing football

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started